![]() Thanks to this development, researchers are more likely to get the specific recognition they deserve. In some journals, this is done in a brief “Author Note” or “Author Information” section. This is unfortunate for junior authors who do not have many papers to their name: when people see a list of authors with no explicit indication of who did what, they may give an outsize amount of credit to the senior author.įortunately, over the last few decades, many journals have begun to encourage, and some to require, that teams give some indication of who did what in the work reported by a paper. When uncertain, people fall back on their prior beliefs. Some information could be tentatively inferred from the order of names in the list, but how order is determined reflects often-unwritten practices around authorship that can be obscure to people outside a subfield and can differ substantially between labs. Yet until recently, journals still operated as if there was no need to provide any information other than a list of names-the author list. Different members of the team usually have different roles. ![]() Today, over three hundred years later, most science is done by groups of people, not by lone individuals. ![]() These letters listed only a single author, and it was clear that that person was claiming credit for all aspects of the work reported. Scholarly journal articles evolved from letters penned by individuals reporting scientific observations or experiment results. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |